Posts Tagged ‘biodynamic’

A Visit to Montalcino: Loacker Corte Pavone

Untitled 0 00 49-25

A nice view of Montalcino

One of the best parts about the wine school I go to in Florence are the field trips that we go on to see different wineries and producers. Here is the website if anyone is interested. Seeing and speaking with the producers has taught me so much about wine, that you can not find in text books.

Corte Pavone is an Estate owned by Austrian born Rainer Loacker.  He also owns estates in Sudtirol(Alto-Adige) and in Maremma in Tuscany.  Here, at Corte Pavone, he utilizes biodynamic principales to grow his grapes for Brunello di Montalino, Rosso di Montalcino, and an IGT wine.

Mr. Loaker is a great man and I would never discredit him.  His Brunellos and Rossos are fantastic wines, but I do however find his philosophy contradictory.  I’ve explained in a previous post how I feel about biodynamic wines.  To me, if you believe in astrology and horoscopes than you can make biodynamic wines.  He believes is certain “types” of days. For instance, there are fruit days, pruning days, green days, harvesting days etc. He also believes that there are little gnomes who live in the woods and somehow they have an effect on the production of wine.  I was quite fascinated, but at the same had a hard time believing in gnomes.   Producers like him look to the moon and starts to determine when to prune, harvest and bottle.  He only uses yeasts naturally present on the grape for fermentation, he wants to be as natural as possible.

Mr. Loacker  uses an interesting way of cleaning his cellar.  He floods the cellar a tiny bit with water loaded with specific microorganisms that disinfect the floor.  This process eliminates the use of chemical cleaning agents that he believes would contaminate the wine.

Here is where the irony comes into play.  After his philosophical speech, we went down into the cellar. So now I’m thinking this place is going to be “hippie-like”.  It seemed as though he was against the use of technology in his speech, but I was totally wrong.  This cellar looked like a NASA laboratory.  The pumps and vats were brand new and state of the art.  The fermentation tanks had an electronically timed cap mixer that punched the cap down every 3-4 hours.The cap is the “head” that forms during fermentation that contains the skins and pulp.  There was also a micro-oxygenator that he uses to sustain the wine and life of the yeasts.  Here’s a description of what this thing does:

“The aim in micro-oxygenation is to bleed oxygen in at just the right rate–which may vary from 0.25 to 100 milliliters per-liter per month–without overexposing the wine to it. Costs, according to Smith, run about two thousand dollars per wine tank. The purpose is to bring about desirable changes in wine texture and aroma that cannot be obtained by traditional aging techniques. The goals of micro-oxygenation include the restructuring of tannins and mouthfeel, color stability, aroma integration, decreased sulfide and reductive aromas, and increased longevity potential. What it does not do is promote early release or premature aging of wine.”

Untitled 0 00 18-01

You can the micro-oxygenator in te back left. Its that blue thing that looks like an oxygen tank. You can also see the the stainless steel poled on top of the vats. These are the cap breakers.

It just seems a little weird to me that a person can believe in gnomes and look to the stars for advice, yet he uses equipment that is found in a  NASA laboratory(of course I am speaking sarcastically)…I will quote something that my friend said to me after the trip,”I believe in terroir, not religion.”  I mean, that sums it right there for me. What are some of your thoughts and feelings on this?

Ever see a bottling truck in action?  Check back tomorrow for the video!

The “Natural” Dilemma

There has been a recent trend in the wine making community of trying to produce wines with as little chemical intervention as possible. While I am totally for these methods, there are many other things that we should worry about first, rather than how much sulfite is in our wine. There are also some words like “natural” ,”organic”, and “biodynamic” that get thrown around and people really don’t know what they mean. So here it is.

organicOrganic: The word organic literally means, ” of, relating to, or derived from living organisms” or “of, relating to, or containing carbon compounds”. This is not really an entirely descriptive word, however. There are different standards in different countries for what “organic” means, so you don’t really know what your getting. In simplest terms it means that the grapes were farmed without the use of man made chemical pesticides and fertilizers. Wines labeled “organic” are not always sulfite free. Sulfites occur naturally in wine and the addition of sulfites might be allowed under some laws . In America, added sulfites are not allowed if  you want your product to be organically made.

Natural: “being in accordance with or determined by nature” . Hearing this expression in describing a product rubs me like course sandpaper. In most cases, nothing but a great marketing ploy by some witty ad agency leading people to believe that eating any amount of “natural” food is healthy and don’t mind paying extra for the classification. For example… I constantly come across the phrase written on olive oil jars, “Made from 100% Natural Olives”.  Doesn’t olive oil have to come from “natural” olives?  I can’t imagine making synthetic olive trees.   Or even a better question…what is a “non natural” olive? With wines, it is a similar mystery. There is no certification for “natural” wine. Some producers use the term, perhaps, to distinguish themselves from those of “organic” or “biodynamic” wine making methods. If wine is made from grapes then it is “natural” unless one wants to venture into the woods and find a wild vine bush with decaying berries on the ground that have started to ferment, fill a cup and drink the juice.   Then you can  note the hints of formic acid(ant juice) and bouquet of musca domestica . Now that’s “natural” and “includes protein.”

Biodynamic:  The definition, ” a method of organic farming that treats farms as unified and individual organisms, emphasizing balancing the holistic development and interrelationship of the soil, plants, animals as a closed, self-nourishing system”. Pretty complicated it seems  and  some what equivalent to relying on astrology and horoscopes in the wine industry. Winemakers look to the moon and stars for cues of when to plant, fertilize,

manure-like substance being put into a horn

manure-like substance being put into a horn

and harvest. Bull horns are stuffed with flowers, herbs, manure and rocks which are then planted somewhere in the vineyard. Its almost voodoo-like if you ask me. In my opinion, the quality of wine would be attributed to the passion of the winemaker and the attention to detail that goes into biodynamic farming, rather than the mysterious practices. Its strange, but for some reason I am all for it.

Heres the bottom line. I am totally for sustainable and “green” agricultural practices. I will buy these wines not because I want to be healthy but because I simply want to experience something different and as an added benefit, support the green movement. Should more wines makers move to this direction? I think that wine makers should try to produce the best possible wines in the cleanest and environmentally responsible way without sacrificing quality. Wine like all other products is a commodity. Higher demand for a particular kind of wine will have higher costs. If the demand is for organically produced wines, then the reduced yields will generate the higher costs. Instead of having a crop of 15,000 kilos with the use of traditional techniques, you may now have a crop of 9,500 kilos. This reduces supply, which also will increase costs.

… continue reading this entry.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.